Proprietary trading — prop trading — has moved from the exclusive domain of investment banks to something any skilled retail trader can access. The shift happened between 2015 and 2022 when a new category of firm emerged: the retail prop firm, which funds independent traders through a structured evaluation process.
If you have come across firms like FTMO, The5ers, or FundingPips and are trying to understand what they actually are and whether the model is legitimate, this guide explains everything clearly.

A proprietary trading firm provides traders with funded accounts — capital that is not the trader’s own — and splits the resulting profits with the trader. In exchange for access to this capital, the trader must demonstrate consistent, rule-compliant trading during an evaluation phase.
The modern retail prop firm model works like this:
The funded account in most retail prop firms is a simulated environment — the firm does not give you a live account with real market exposure. Profits are paid from the firm’s own funds based on your trading performance. This is an important distinction that affects how you should evaluate these firms.
The model is legitimate when operated by credible firms. The key question is not whether prop trading itself is legitimate — it clearly is — but whether any specific firm you are considering has a verifiable payout track record.
Between 2022 and 2024, the industry grew from roughly 50 firms to over 400. As of 2025, approximately one third of those firms have gone out of business or stopped processing payouts. The firms that survived tend to share several characteristics:
The team at ResponsibleTrading.com has reviewed and scored over 25 prop firms based on these criteria, with no paid placements affecting the rankings.
Every prop firm challenge has three core rules that determine whether you pass or fail. Understanding them is more important than any trading strategy.
This is the percentage gain you need to reach to pass each phase. A typical 2-step challenge requires 8% in Phase 1 and 5% in Phase 2. One-step challenges typically require 10%. The profit target is measured on the starting balance of the account, not your high-water mark.
This is the maximum you can lose in a single trading day, measured as a percentage of either the starting balance or the end-of-day balance, depending on the firm. Most firms set this at 4-5%. Breaching it on a single day ends your challenge immediately, regardless of your overall account performance.
This rule catches more traders than any other. A single bad session — holding a losing position overnight, a news spike, a technical error — can end a challenge that was otherwise on track.
This is the maximum total loss from the starting balance (fixed drawdown) or from your highest account value (trailing drawdown). A trailing drawdown is significantly more restrictive because it follows your profits up — meaning a $10,000 account with a 10% trailing drawdown that you grow to $11,000 now has a floor of $9,900, not $9,000.
Always check whether a firm uses fixed or trailing drawdown before purchasing a challenge. Trailing drawdown is a fundamentally different risk environment.
Here is the honest maths. Most traders fail their first prop trading challenge. Industry estimates suggest 70-85% of challenges are not passed on the first attempt. This is not because the rules are designed to be impossible — it is because most traders do not have the risk management discipline that prop firm rules require.
Before purchasing a challenge, ask yourself honestly whether your historical trading performance, if applied to a prop firm account, would have breached the daily loss limit or maximum drawdown. Be specific — look at your actual worst days and worst drawdowns.
If the answer is yes, the challenge will teach you discipline. But it will cost you the challenge fee. If the answer is no, you have a realistic chance of passing and the economics become compelling — access to $100,000-$500,000 in funded capital for a one-time fee of $99-$999 is genuinely difficult to replicate any other way.
Use the prop firm challenge comparison tool to see the full rules, fees, and profit splits for all major firms side by side.

A single evaluation phase with one profit target. Faster path to funding but usually higher profit target (8-10%) and higher challenge fee. Best for experienced traders who are confident in their consistency.
Two evaluation phases with lower profit targets (8% then 5% is typical). More forgiving structure, usually the lowest entry fee. Best for traders who want a less pressured evaluation.
No evaluation phase — you pay a fee and receive a funded account immediately. Lower profit split (often starting at 50%) that increases with each successful withdrawal. Best for traders who want to start generating profits immediately without an evaluation period.
All of these details are available in the reviews and comparison tool at ResponsibleTrading.com — the most comprehensive independent database of prop firm challenge rules currently available.
Prop trading is a legitimate and potentially lucrative path for disciplined traders. The model works. The risk is not the model itself — the risk is choosing a firm with unclear rules, a short track record, or payout delays, and losing your challenge fee as a result.
Do the research before you pay. Read the rules in full. Check the Trustpilot reviews. Use an independent comparison resource. And only choose a challenge structure that matches the way you actually trade — not the way you intend to trade.
Last Updated on July 28, 2026